Adams v. Adams (USA)

Danielle Kira Adams, a transwoman formerly called  William Benjamin Adams, appeals from a denial of his motion to dismiss a divorce decree addressing custody, visitation, and division of property.

Among other arguments, Adams argued that the court discriminated against him by (1) ignoring the alleged discriminatory bias of a counselor chosen by his ex-wife; (2) preventing Adams from questioning the counselor on his religious beliefs; and (3) ordering Adams to present himself as male with his children for a time.  While asserting that there is no Arkansas law dealing with “the civil liberty of gender expression” or prohibiting discrimination against gender identity, Adams also submitted no permissive or persuasive authority from any other jurisdictions, directly addressing or distinguishing his claim. The court concluded that it is not the duty of the court to research or develop arguments for Adams on appeal. Accordingly, the court did not address the merits of this argument.

Adams v. Adams.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s